The Journal of Advanced, Basic, and Applied Research in Mathematics Education employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to uphold the quality, validity, and academic integrity of its published articles.

Upon submission, all manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to ascertain their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, and adherence to submission guidelines. Manuscripts that successfully pass this preliminary evaluation are subsequently subjected to a comprehensive review by at least two independent reviewers who possess specialized expertise pertinent to the manuscript’s subject matter.

During the double-blind review process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to preserve objectivity and mitigate potential bias. Reviewers assess manuscripts based on their scholarly merit, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, theoretical and practical contributions, and alignment with mathematics education research.

Based on the reviewers’ evaluations, the editor makes one of the following decisions: acceptance, acceptance with minor revisions, revision and resubmission, or rejection. Authors are obligated to address all reviewers’ comments clearly and systematically. Revised manuscripts may be returned to the reviewers for further evaluation when deemed necessary.

The editorial team ensures that the peer review process is conducted in a fair, timely, and confidential manner. All participants involved in the review process are expected to adhere to ethical standards, including confidentiality, objectivity, and the disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest.